Digiscoping camera adapters for Telescopes...? - camera adapter for telescopes solid, heavy, too big
Hey there,
I have a 'Sky Watcher (also known as the Skyliner) 200P
8 "Dobsonian telescope dish" and took some pictures, but, but I always had the camera ...
If someone can tell me if this card in my area that would fit http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=390057468504&ssPageName=ADME:X:AAQ:GB: 1123
Thank you in advance.
Friday, February 5, 2010
Camera Adapter For Telescopes Solid, Heavy, Too Big Digiscoping Camera Adapters For Telescopes...?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
The only thing you have to make the size of the weight of the camera on the end of his telescope. Probably the scope statement with the extra weight. They are the reason backwards from the scope on the basis that the most important turning point, the height to be found.
The bulk of the weight of the areas in which the mirror cell, the eye is longer than the definitive end of the ice, so the scope is the balance. For example - if the end of the range of the eye 2 times longer than the end of the mirror (at the height of the pivot point measured), which means that kg per 1 is in the eye, it takes 2 kg in the fight against the mirror, to the extent of revision.
The next thing we have need to fear is tracking about. Standard Dobsonian telescope is a visual tool. If you add images directly from the moon, no problem so deep-sky images (eg, the Orion Nebula, you will need a couple of seconds to minutes of the value of surveillance that is another question. The field must be the object without to touch them or to followHis will therwise vibrations that induce ruin his image.
And finally, you need a camera that held the door open for more than a few seconds. But it is a completely different matter all together very well. But research astrophtography webcam, a cheap method, but useful for lunar and a large photo of the planet.
Post a Comment